<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    
    <channel>
    
    <title>Financial Risk Manager</title>
    <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/</link>
    <description>Financial Risk Manager</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T22:39:47-08:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Comparision between binomial and BSM model</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/936/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/936/#When:05:07:43Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dear David
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have created one spreadsheet where I am valuing put and call option with undernoted assumption.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font&#45;size:18px;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:red;&quot;&gt;( please see uploaded excel spreadsheet as well)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;stock    150
&lt;br /&gt;
Strike    100
&lt;br /&gt;
Volatility    5%
&lt;br /&gt;
Rf    5%
&lt;br /&gt;
T    1
&lt;br /&gt;
With the above assumption, I am getting call price of Rs.54.88 with both binomial and BSM method, but when I am increasing the volatility, I am getting a slight price differencial (i.e. when volatility is 20%, price of call becomes 54.97.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
My question: But when the same volatility jump is applied over to put valuation using binomial and BSM, I am getting a huge price difference. i.e. at
&lt;br /&gt;
stock    75
&lt;br /&gt;
Strike    100
&lt;br /&gt;
Volatility    5%
&lt;br /&gt;
Rf    5%
&lt;br /&gt;
T    1
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
above assumption, I am getting same value for put option using binomial and BSM model, but when I am rasing the volatility to 20%, I am getting a huge price differential with Binomial it is 21.07 and with BSM it is 14.39.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
1.&amp;nbsp; What is the causative factor for such a huge difference?
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Which model is optimum to use in real market situation?
&lt;br /&gt;
3.When Stock=strike why put option have zero value but call option still positive through BSM model. even when I am having strike price of 100 and stock price of 75, I am getting a positive call value call=max(s&#45;x,0).
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Is option value and option premium different?
&lt;br /&gt;
5.Which model the market participants are using mostly?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Regards,
&lt;br /&gt;
Harish
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-25T05:07:43-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Metallgeschaft &#45; Contango / Backwardation</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/929/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/929/#When:20:33:01Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think I got the MG question right in the 2008 FRM exam, but I confuse myself when thinking about why positions lose value in contango or backwardation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For the short position in long&#45;term forward contracts during backwardation, these gain value because it locks in a higher price in the future for the seller? During backwardation, the forward price will be lower compared to the agreed price in the forward contract, creating profits?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For the long position in short&#45;term futures contracts during contango, these lose value because it locks in a higher price in the future for the buyer? Each rolling hedge will require MG to buy at a higher price?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T20:33:01-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Base currency Vs foreign currency</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/81/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/81/#When:02:24:19Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;David
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Always had this confusion on interpreting the BC and FC.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The current exchange rate between Japanese yen and US dollar is 134 yen/dollar. The one&#45;year
&lt;br /&gt;
interest rate in USA is 1.95 percent and the one&#45;year interest rate in Japan is 0.65 percent.
&lt;br /&gt;
According to interest rate parity the one&#45;year forward yen/dollar exchange rate should be
&lt;br /&gt;
CLOSEST to:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A. 130.59.
&lt;br /&gt;
B. 131.73.
&lt;br /&gt;
C. 132.29.
&lt;br /&gt;
D. 133.50.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The question is simple;  the answer being Spot * (1+ domestic)/(1+foreign)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The question is  how do you interpret which is domestic and which is foreign? Also is there is a rough cut way of double checking with respect to interest rates. (if domestic interest rates &amp;lt; foreign interest rates) then ..... and vice versa
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Grateful for a quick reply&#8230; as I am not able to get a fix on this
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thanks as always
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
J
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
PS: while you have pointed out that Interest rate parity is not included in the LOs, the sample FRM questions 2007 has a similar question as above, and in any case these kind of questions  is an appln of the forward price determination.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2007-11-09T02:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Liquidity cost</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/919/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/919/#When:05:38:25Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;hi,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
simple quick question
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
why is liquidity cost low when the asset is fungible
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
could you explain it ?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
if  the asset that i want to liquidate is fungible, the buyer of this asset can choose another asset which is a substitution of mine
&lt;br /&gt;
therefore, isn&#8217;t it hard to liquidate? then it costs more, doesn&#8217;t it?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
i think im wrong, but i can not understand in the opposite way 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
suk
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-14T05:38:25-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>zero cpn bond</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/918/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/918/#When:18:56:38Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I was trying to find the calculator tutorial on here but having some trouble
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I was hoping someone could help me price a zero cpn bond using the financial calculator.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure what the various inputs should be.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately i dont have an example right now but i guess my biggest question is what should be input as PMT and N?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thaks
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-13T18:56:38-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>practice exam</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/894/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/894/#When:13:39:09Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi David,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
    List of questions where &#8220;I don&#8217;t get it&#8221; is growing as exam approaches  &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bionicturtle.com/images/smileys/downer.gif&quot; width=&quot;19&quot; height=&quot;19&quot; alt=&quot;downer&quot; style=&quot;border:0;&quot; /&gt; .( A bit disappointed about the Flash Quiz because there are no reliable set of questions to practice on which cover all the AIMS and since you are best teacher I have come across your questions would have really helped practice better .)
&lt;br /&gt;
            Anyway will attempt some of your 2007 questions. I did not understand this question in 2007 FRM practice exam .It&#8217;s from Hull and i am supposed to know it and i don&#8217;t .I understand it is a Var calculation and the square root rule has been used but why duration?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hong Kong Shanghi Bank has entered into a repurchase agreement with a client where
&lt;br /&gt;
the client will sell a 10&#45;year US treasury bond to the bank and repurchase it in 10 days.
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond has a notional value of USD 10m, trades at par with the yield volatility for a 10&#45;
&lt;br /&gt;
year US treasury 0.074%. The swap’s maximum potential exposure at a 99% confidence
&lt;br /&gt;
level is closest to:
&lt;br /&gt;
a. USD 320,000
&lt;br /&gt;
b. USD 380,000
&lt;br /&gt;
c. USD 550,000
&lt;br /&gt;
d. USD 1,200,000
&lt;br /&gt;
CORRECT: B
&lt;br /&gt;
The approximate duration for a 10 year bond is 7.0. The volatility of the swap value over
&lt;br /&gt;
10 years is calculated as follows:
&lt;br /&gt;
σ(V) = [market_value * duration * yield volatility *(10)0.5]
&lt;br /&gt;
= 10,000,000 * 7.0 * 0.00074 * 3.16 = 163,806.
&lt;br /&gt;
To get the 99% confidence interval, we multiply σ(V) by 2.33, which gives approximately
&lt;br /&gt;
$380,000.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Reference: John Hull, Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 6th ed. Chapter 7.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Regards
&lt;br /&gt;
Ravi
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-11T13:39:09-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Merton Model, and risk capital</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/913/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/913/#When:18:57:43Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;hi,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
in 06 practice exam part II, no.82
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
82. Consider a risky zero&#45;coupon bond maturing in one year. At that time the issuer owes
&lt;br /&gt;
USD 100 million. The issuer has no other debt and the bond can be priced using Merton&#8217;s model.
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond is the only asset of a bank. Which of the following statements is correct?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
a. The amount of risk capital required for this bond by the bank necessarily increases if
&lt;br /&gt;
the volatility of the assets of the issuer increases
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
b. The amount of risk capital required for this bond exhibits a hump shape &#45; it first
&lt;br /&gt;
increases with asset volatility and then falls
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
c. The shape of the relation between the amount of risk capital and asset volatility
&lt;br /&gt;
cannot be determined without knowing the bank&#8217;s RAROC hurdle rate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
d. The shape of the relation between the amount of risk capital and asset volatility
&lt;br /&gt;
cannot be determined without knowing the confidence level at which the bank&#8217;s
&lt;br /&gt;
credit&#45;VaR is calculated
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ANSWER: B
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A risky bond can be decomposed into a risk&#45;free bond and a put option. The price of
&lt;br /&gt;
the bond equals the price of the default free bond minus the put option premium. As
&lt;br /&gt;
the asset volatility increases, the put premium will increase and the price of the risky
&lt;br /&gt;
bond will fall. Thus, a bond issued by a firm with extremely high asset volatility will be
&lt;br /&gt;
almost worthless, so that it requires little capital.
&lt;br /&gt;
&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
i think the explanation at bottom does not match the answer b.
&lt;br /&gt;
could you help me to understand?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-12T18:57:43-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>inverse floater hedging</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/914/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/914/#When:19:21:37Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;hi,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A reverse floater hedges against falling benchmark yields
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
could you explain how it works?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
thanks
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
suk
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-12T19:21:37-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>contango and backwardation of commodity</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/908/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/908/#When:11:46:08Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
question 27, in 08 practice exam part III
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
27. Which of the following best describes what we would normally expect to see in a seasonal agricultural
&lt;br /&gt;
market like wheat? Assume “the harvest” is normal and not unusually big or unusually small. Now
&lt;br /&gt;
consider the following statements about the market.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I. Prices fall at the harvest and rise after the harvest.
&lt;br /&gt;
II. Prices are constant on average across the year regardless of seasonality.
&lt;br /&gt;
III. Prices rise at the harvest and fall afterwards.
&lt;br /&gt;
IV. The market is in contango when the harvest comes in.
&lt;br /&gt;
V. The market is in backwardation when the harvest comes in.
&lt;br /&gt;
VI. If the market goes into contango, it is most likely to do so right before a new harvest.
&lt;br /&gt;
VII. If the market goes into backwardation, it is most likely to do so right before a new harvest.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now choose the letter that best describes which of the above statements is true.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
could you explain how the price changes according to harvest?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
downward sloping before harvest and then upward after harvest , is it right??
&lt;br /&gt;
that is, backwardation before harvest and contango after harvest
&lt;br /&gt;
so confused,, 
&lt;br /&gt;
both IV and VII are true but aren&#8217;t they clashed each other? 
&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;when the harvest comes in&#8221; means.. approaching to harvest ? or exactly at the harvest?
&lt;br /&gt;
i need to improve my english first of all,, 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
thanks!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
suk
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-12T11:46:08-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>question from 06 practice exam</title>
      <link>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/910/</link>
      <guid>http://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/viewthread/910/#When:18:05:35Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;hi,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
06 practice exam part II
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
no.61
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
61. What is the best estimate of the market value of a portfolio of USD 100 million invested in
&lt;br /&gt;
recently issued 6% 10&#45;year bonds and USD 100 million of long 10&#45;year zero coupon bond if
&lt;br /&gt;
interest rates decline by 0.50%:
&lt;br /&gt;
a. USD 219 million
&lt;br /&gt;
b. USD 195 million
&lt;br /&gt;
c. USD 209 million
&lt;br /&gt;
d. USD 206 million
&lt;br /&gt;
ANSWER: C
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To calculate the best estimate of the market value of the portfolio if interest
&lt;br /&gt;
rates decline 0.5%, one needs to calculate the change in the market value of
&lt;br /&gt;
each bond using duration. The duration of the 10&#45;year zero coupon bond is
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Thus, the change in value of this bond equals 10x0.005x100,000,000,
&lt;br /&gt;
which equals 5 million dollars.
&lt;br /&gt;
The duration of the newly issued 6% bond is 7.802 assuming that the price of
&lt;br /&gt;
the bond is par. Given a duration of 7.802, the change in the value of the
&lt;br /&gt;
bond equals 7.802x0.005x100,000,000 which equals 3.91 million.
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the best estimate of the market value of the portfolio if interest rates
&lt;br /&gt;
decline by 0.5% is 200 million + 5 million + 3.91 million which equals 208.91
&lt;br /&gt;
million.
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the correct answer is ‘C’.
&lt;br /&gt;
&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;&#45;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
i feel so strange, 
&lt;br /&gt;
market value of zero bond is notional / (1+r)^10 , right?
&lt;br /&gt;
but here, maculay duration is being used, not modified duration to estimate change in value
&lt;br /&gt;
is this bad question to be ignored?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
suk
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2008-11-12T18:05:35-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>