Signup is easy. join now! | forgot password?

Bionic Turtle

Learn Finance with the pros. Better articles, resources and screencasts for easier learning.

Financial Risk Manger Exam Prep Register & Join our community (it's free!) Learn Free & Premium Access Articles with David Harper, CFA, FRM, CIPM More >
   
 
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Learn
  • About
  • Community
  • Premium
Market A - Question 2
 
You are here: Forum Home  >  Forums  >  2008 FRM Screencast Tutorial Q&A  >  Thread
David Harper, CFA, FRM, CIPM
Posted: 05 May 2008 11:05 AM   [ Ignore ]  
Administrator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1286
Joined  2006-09-24

Question:

Assume the Standard and Poor’s Index currently stands at 1400; the dividend yield on the index is 2%; and the riskless rate is 4%.

(i) What is the price of the four-month futures contract?
(ii) Is this contango or backwardation?
(iii) Tough: Do we expect normal contango or normal backwardation?

Answer:
costofcarry.png

(i) The “universal” cost of carry formula above will handle most situations (if the costs/benefits can be expressed as constant %). Costs of carry are: r = riskless rate, u = storage costs. Benefits of carry are: q = income/dividend, y = convenience yield.

In this case, F(0) = (1400)EXP[(4%-2%)(4/12)] = about 1409

(ii)
Contago because F > S

(iii)
First, we don’t know with certainty. “Normal backwardation” is possible with “contango.” “Normal contango” is possible with “contango.” I don’t know is a good answer!

Second, see p 121 of Hull. Where there is positive correlation btwn asset (stock) and underlying (S and P), we expect forward price to understate the expected future spot. As here, where systemic risk exists, we can expect normal backwardation (consistent with traditional theory, somewhat empirically verified, that normal backwardation ought to be the state of things because speculators [i.e., those taking a long position in the futures contract] demand compensation in the form of a risk premium). So, for both those reasons, we could *expect* or theorize normal backwardation.

Profile
 
shuihongwong
Posted: 27 August 2008 10:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  16
Joined  2008-07-15

Please clarify: Is normal backwardation means expected future spot price will be higher than the forward price at time T to compensate speculators who long the foward/future?

Profile
 
David Harper, CFA, FRM, CIPM
Posted: 27 August 2008 10:46 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Administrator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1286
Joined  2006-09-24

Yes exactly. You’ve stated both what is normal backwardation (forward price T < expected future spot at time T) and the theory for why it might/should exist. (Kolb was first best on this thy, to my knowledge)

I also like the way you put it because, as such, normal backwardation/contango concerns the future/spot relationship at future time T

whereas backwardation/contango are merely about what we observe/compare; time 0 (spot) to forward (time t), forward (t-1), etc. David

Profile
 
   
 
 
‹‹ Market A - Question 1      Market A - Question 3 ››

Powered By ExpressionEngine
Template Design based on Sonnenvogel.com | Customized by Lealea Design
Select a theme:

ExpressionEngine Discussion Forum - Version 2.0.0 (20070626)
Script Executed in 0.1669 seconds

RSS 2.0