Signup is easy. join now! | forgot password?

Bionic Turtle

Learn Finance with the pros. Better articles, resources and screencasts for easier learning.

Financial Risk Manger Exam Prep Register & Join our community (it's free!) Learn Free & Premium Access Articles with David Harper, CFA, FRM, CIPM More >
   
 
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Learn
  • About
  • Community
  • Premium
E[CAPM] & Market VaR Zero Mean Assumption
 
You are here: Forum Home  >  Forums  >  Quantitative Methods  >  Thread
mikey10011
Posted: 21 October 2008 04:08 PM   [ Ignore ]  
Jr. Member
RankRank
Total Posts:  38
Joined  2008-08-14

On slide QUANT A slide 21 the time series to calculate daily VaR was assumed to have an expected return of zero.

Question: Given that under CAPM the expected return E[r] is nonzero (= riskfree rate + beta x market risk premium), how do I reconcile the two?

Profile
 
David Harper, CFA, FRM, CIPM
Posted: 21 October 2008 04:46 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Administrator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1302
Joined  2006-09-24

Mikey,

I’ll assume you are reading not listening smile I don’t blame you....The CAPM is right. Slide 21 refers to the TWO SIMPLIFYING ASSUMPTIONS we make (following Hull) including: assume mean return = 0. It is a “rounding off,” that is technically INCORRECT but conventionally (by practice) okay b/c the daily mean return will be small; e.g., +20% annual is only (1/252) 8 basis points. It makes the variance easy: squared returns = variance. That’s all. It is (even more) correct to include the mean return.

Pleaes note: we don’t take this shortcut for longer intervals (monthly periods, annual periods) where the mean return becomes materially non-zero.

David

Profile
 
   
 
 
‹‹ Confused on when to use one tail or two tail      Corr & Cov ››

Powered By ExpressionEngine
Template Design based on Sonnenvogel.com | Customized by Lealea Design
Select a theme:

ExpressionEngine Discussion Forum - Version 2.0.0 (20070626)
Script Executed in 0.3123 seconds

RSS 2.0