Question about Bionic Turtle's 2009 FRM Program
07 Jan 2009
Learn Finance with the pros. Better articles, resources and screencasts for easier learning.
FRM |
The idea here is that portfolios with similar durations do not necessarily have similar convexities; and therefore, they are not necessarily responsive in the same way to interest rates changes. Let's define barbells and bullets:
Further, in a portfolio of bonds, both the portfolio duration and portfolio convexity are weighted averages of the individual bond durations and convexities. Therefore it is easy to match asset duration with liability duration: just match portfolio weighted averages. But convexities are not so easy.
Assume a simple two-bond portfolio, where each bond is 50% of the portfolio.
A two-asset barbell portfolio might combine a short-term bond (duration equals 1.0) with a long-term bond (duration equals 30). The portfolio duration is about 15.5 (31/2 = 15.2) but the portfolio convexity is about 450 (901/2 = 450.5) because the convexity of the 30-year bond is nearer to 900 (these are rough estimates):
A two-asset bullet portfolio could invest entirely in two 16-year bonds (or one 15-year bond and one 16-year bond) with a duration of 15.5. The bullet portfolio could be constructed to match the duration of the barbell portfolio above. However, the convexity of the bullet portfolio will be lower:
Therefore, although the durations match, the barbell portfolio (and generally a portfolio that spreads out cash flows to longer maturities) will be still be more sensitive to interest rate changes.
07 Jan 2009
05 Jan 2009
04 Jan 2009
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!
Leave a Comment