Question about Bionic Turtle's 2009 FRM Program
07 Jan 2009
Learn Finance with the pros. Better articles, resources and screencasts for easier learning.
FRM |
For FRM candidates, there are two ways to view duration:
If you keep in mind this limitation of the first-order derivative, it comes in handy. For example, convexity (in the case of bonds) and the Taylor expansion (in the case of stock options) are meant to help fix the gap between the nonlinear reality and the linear approximation (e.g., duration, delta).
The learning outcome asks for effective duration. Duration refers to either modified or effective duration. Modified does not assume that a yield change will change the underlying bond cash flows; effective duration incorporates the realism (the feedback loop, if you will) that yield changes impact the underlying cash flows. In the case of the simple bond (illustrated below), it does not matter. It matters for bonds with embedded derivatives. Both are different from the Macaulay duration. The Macaulay duration is the duration implied when somebody says "the bond's duration is four years." Thinking of duration as time, however, it not as useful to risk managers. Better to view duration as sensitivity.
The formula for (effective) duration is given by:
This example is further demonstrated in the EditGrid spreadsheet at the end of this article (to upload to Excel or other format, select File > Save As..).
Here are the bond assumptions (left-hand column of spreadsheet below):
We only need to decide how much to shock the yield. We will use 20 basis points (equal to 0.2%). Given the shock in 20 bps, the numerator is the difference of the two re-priced bonds (i.e., one priced at 5.8% and another at 6.2%). The result is about a duration of about 7.93:
There are only two columns. The left are bond assumptions. The right column computes the (effective) duration but requires the shock value (20 basis points) as an input.
07 Jan 2009
05 Jan 2009
04 Jan 2009
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!
Leave a Comment