bottom up and top down approach
07 Sep 2008
Learn Finance with the pros. Better articles, resources and screencasts for easier learning.
FRM |
A couple of recent conversation threads in the forum highlight the importance of forward rates as an FRM building block.
Consider my unimaginative, unrealistic spot rate term structure: [2% @ 0.5 years, 2.5% @ 1.0 years, 3% @ 1.5 years, 3.5% at 2 years and 4% at 2.5 years]. Here is something to ponder until it sinks in: this term structure already contains, implicitly, a set of forward rates:
The numbers behind this chart:
As usual, the compounding frequency matters a bit. Tuckman (who is FRM assigned) and Hull (who is not for this) use the same concept only the compounding frequency is different. Consider the six-month rate starting in six months. We have a few ways to denote this rate:
Consider the minor procedural difference between Tuckman and Hull:
Here is a key passage from Tuckman, worth mastering (emphasis mine):
It is no coincidence that when the six-month rate evolves according to the initial forward rate curve investors rolling short-term bonds and investors buying long-term bonds perform equally well. Recall that an investment in a bond is equivalent to a series of forward loans at rates given by the forward rate curve.
This spreadsheet applies my example above; note also the Bond Price is computed (light blue at end) and bond price is the same regardless of whether we use the spots or the forwards, but it differs slightly depending on the compound frequency.
07 Sep 2008
07 Sep 2008
06 Sep 2008
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!
Leave a Comment