How can higher NPV project be undesirable? [practice]
by David Harper, CFA, FRM, CIPM
Sample Question L1.3. A corporation is faced with the decision to choose between the two following projects:
Project Investment Perpetual Annual Cash Flow Cash Flow at Risk
A 100 20 50
B 80 55 200
Assuming that there is no systematic risk and the projects are mutually exclusive, under what circumstances would project A be selected over project B? [source: FRM 2010 practice exam]
- a. Project A should never be chosen because it requires a larger initial investment and generates lower perpetual annual cash flows.
- b. Project A could be preferred over Project B if Project A’s cash flows are negatively correlated with the firm’s existing cash flows while the cash flows of Project B are highly positively correlated with the firm’s existing cash flows.
- c. Project A should be chosen if the opportunity cost of funds is low, and Project B should be chosen otherwise.
- d. Project A should be chosen if the net present value of the project is positive.
[my adds]
3.2. If the confidence level is 95%, what are the implied project cash flow volatilities?
3.3 Is Stulz CFaR a relative or absolute VaR?
3.4 The question says “assuming there is no systematic risk…” What does that imply about beta? Are there any non-zero betas to be found?
Answers:
See the following related questions and/or threads at the bionicturtle.com forum:
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!
Leave a Comment