Thanks David
20 Nov 2008
Learn Finance with the pros. Better articles, resources and screencasts for easier learning.
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the largest institutional proxy advisory, just released their 2007 Update to US Corporate Governance Policies. When a public company makes a shareholder request for additional equity incentive plan shares, ISS applies two tests. The first is their longstanding calculation of shareholder value transfer (SVT).
The second was implemented only in 2005: a test of a company’s burn rate compared to its industry peers. The burn rate is given by:

If, for example, a company granted 1 million options during FY 2006, while common shares outstanding (CSO) were 100 million, that is a 1% burn rate. What do they do if instead the company granted 600,000 restricted shares? That’s the point of the numerator expressed in option-equivalents. Depending on the stock’s volatility, the full-value awards are converted to 1.5 (high volatility), 2.0 (moderate volatility), or 4.0 (low volatility). So if our company’s stock volatility was moderate (i.e., between 25% and 52% inclusive), then 600,000 restricted shares is deemed to be worth 1.2 million option-equivalents and the burn rate is 1.2%.
Given a company’s three-year average burn rate, ISS does not want to see a company’s burn rate exceed one standard deviation above its industry peers. That is, they will vote against a share request unless the company commits to bringing burn rate within one standard deviation.
For example, among media companies, the mean burn rate was 1.78%. Add 0.92% for +1 standard deviation, and you get 2.7%. Therefore, ISS is likely to vote against a new plan request if that company is a media company with an average burn rate that exceeds 2.7%. Note there are separate tests for Russell 3000 and non-Russell companies; smaller companies tend to be more dilutive in percentage terms.


The interesting trend for 2007 is that run rates declined markedly across the board. But more so among technolory-related sectors. The acceptable burn rates (i.e., mean plus one standard deviation) plummeted year-over-year for software (-2.18%), semiconductors (-2.27%) and technology hardware (-1.41%).
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!
Leave a Comment