FRM round the corner
21 Nov 2008
Learn Finance with the pros. Better articles, resources and screencasts for easier learning.
We continue the previous post in order to define marginal, incremental and component VaR (based on Jorion's 3rd edition Value at Risk). All three are calculated in the EditGrid spreadsheet below, which can be uploaded to Excel (File > Export As > Excel).
We assume a two-asset portfolio: a $200 position in Canadian dollars and a $100 position in Euors. Previously, we defined...
...now let's define marginal, incremental and component VaR:
Incremental VaR (cell D30) is the change in portfolio VaR implied by a change in a position; e.g., what happens to portfolio VaR if we add to the Canadian dollar position? The full revaluation approach to incremental VaR requires "re-pricing" the portfolio VaR before and after the change in position; the difference is the incremental VaR. On the chart above, it represents the vertical distance on the y-axis (additional portfolio VaR) as we move to the right on the x-axis (additional position).
But the spreadsheet below does not do this. Instead, is uses an approximation to estimate the incremental VaR: marginal VaR multiplied by the new (additional) position.
Marginal VaR (cells D25 and E25) is a first derivative. FRM candidates surely know what that means by now! It's the slope of a tangent line. As Jorion says, marginal VaR is the "change in portfolio VaR resulting from an additional dollar of exposure to a given component." Notice that each position contributes a marginal VaR, which is a function of the variance-covariance matrix.
Component VaR (cells D32 and E32) is a position's contribution to the portfolio VaR. If the position were eliminated, portfolio VaR would drop by the component VaR. Two key things to remember about component VaR:
Here is the EditGrid spreadsheet:
21 Nov 2008
20 Nov 2008
20 Nov 2008
Comments
...
Leave a Comment