Thanks David
20 Nov 2008
Learn Finance with the pros. Better articles, resources and screencasts for easier learning.

We previously discussed three approaches to the estimation of volatility: implied, non-parametric and parametric. Among parametric approaches, we contrasted a simple unweighted approach (i.e., the simple average variance over some history) with weighted approaches where history is not democratic. Specifically, in weighted approaches we assign greater weight to more recent observations. Among weighted approaches, keep in mind that the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) is just a particular form of the more flexible GARCH(1,1):

The EWMA is given by an elegant, recursive formula:

It says, today's (estimated) variance is a function of yesterday's variance and yesterday's squared return. Lambda is the smoothing or persistence parameter. RiskMetrics says the average lambda is about 94%. If lambda is 94%, then the remaining weight of 6% is assigned to yesterday's (or the most recent) squared return.
Here is a spreadsheet where you can change the lambda parameter and see the impact on the series of historical weights assigned to the squared returns. For a high lambda, the weights are "smoother" in the sense that more distant returns are included. When lambda is high (nearer to one), sudden volatility shocks do not abruptly adjust the estimate: the series "remembers" history. It is more smooth or more persistent.
Conversely, as you lower the lambda, higher weights are assigned to more recent observations. Shocks will have a greater impact on the volatility estimate. In summary:
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!
Leave a Comment