# P2.T6. Credit Risk (25%)

Sort By:
Title
Replies Views
Last Message ↓
1. Sticky

### Errors Found in Study Notes P2.T6. Credit Risk

Hello @The Great Khan This is because we were not able to completely update the focus review videos this year so some of the content that was removed from the curriculum may still be included in the videos. We feel that it is better to publish the previous videos rather than to not publish them at all because much of the content is still relevant for this year's exam. Thank you, Nicole
Hello @The Great Khan This is because we were not able to completely update the focus review videos this year so some of the content that was removed from the curriculum may still be included in the videos. We feel that it is better to publish the previous videos rather than to not publish them at all because much of the content is still relevant for this year's exam. Thank you, Nicole
Hello @The Great Khan This is because we were not able to completely update the focus review videos this year so some of the content that was removed from the curriculum may still be included in the videos. We feel that it is better to publish the previous videos rather than to not publish...
Hello @The Great Khan This is because we were not able to completely update the focus review videos this year so some of the content that was removed from the curriculum may still be included in...
Replies:
8
Views:
828
2. ### CVA Questions

I did not talk about hedging, i hope that is clear with my previous post. I think a cds on yourself issued by yourself is essentially worthless. It might theoretically be worth something if your LGD is greater than zero, but I doubt that this is an instrument that is used by anybody anywhere. My point with the buying back of bonds and derivatives is, that you can realize a profit from an...
I did not talk about hedging, i hope that is clear with my previous post. I think a cds on yourself issued by yourself is essentially worthless. It might theoretically be worth something if your LGD is greater than zero, but I doubt that this is an instrument that is used by anybody anywhere. My point with the buying back of bonds and derivatives is, that you can realize a profit from an...
I did not talk about hedging, i hope that is clear with my previous post. I think a cds on yourself issued by yourself is essentially worthless. It might theoretically be worth something if your LGD is greater than zero, but I doubt that this is an instrument that is used by anybody...
I did not talk about hedging, i hope that is clear with my previous post. I think a cds on yourself issued by yourself is essentially worthless. It might theoretically be worth something if...
Replies:
12
Views:
446
3. ### effect of default probability on equity and mezzanine

Thanks @David Harper CFA FRM
Thanks @David Harper CFA FRM
Thanks @David Harper CFA FRM
Thanks @David Harper CFA FRM
Replies:
15
Views:
1,129
4. ### Cash-funded vs. syntethic CDO (borrower consent/notification)

Hi All, I wanted to raise the following topic and share my insights about Cash-funded vs. syntethic CDO and whether one of these requires the borrower notification/obtaining borrower consent? This could be of one of these tricky questions in the exam (similarly engineered questions have turned up at the exam in Nov. 2016) David, it would be much appreciated if we can have your take on this?...
Hi All, I wanted to raise the following topic and share my insights about Cash-funded vs. syntethic CDO and whether one of these requires the borrower notification/obtaining borrower consent? This could be of one of these tricky questions in the exam (similarly engineered questions have turned up at the exam in Nov. 2016) David, it would be much appreciated if we can have your take on this?...
Hi All, I wanted to raise the following topic and share my insights about Cash-funded vs. syntethic CDO and whether one of these requires the borrower notification/obtaining borrower consent? This could be of one of these tricky questions in the exam (similarly engineered questions have turned...
Hi All, I wanted to raise the following topic and share my insights about Cash-funded vs. syntethic CDO and whether one of these requires the borrower notification/obtaining borrower consent?...
Replies:
0
Views:
60
5. ### VaR question (Part 2 exam - members put other question you can recall)

I am stuck with this question too, I was thinking if 5% of loss on 25 loans (1% recovery rate) then that should be time 1.645 but the answer does not match!
I am stuck with this question too, I was thinking if 5% of loss on 25 loans (1% recovery rate) then that should be time 1.645 but the answer does not match!
I am stuck with this question too, I was thinking if 5% of loss on 25 loans (1% recovery rate) then that should be time 1.645 but the answer does not match!
I am stuck with this question too, I was thinking if 5% of loss on 25 loans (1% recovery rate) then that should be time 1.645 but the answer does not match!
Replies:
1
Views:
178
6. ### GARP Part 2 Questions 76 and 33 (garp16-p2-76) (garp16-p2-33)

Just to add to the helpful comments already here: Question 76 is asking for the unconditional PD in year 4, which can be also answered by subtracting th 3-year cumulative PD from the 4-year cumulative PD: (1-5.5%)^4 - (1-5.5%)^3 = 4.64%. I like this calculation because to me it is somewhat intuitive: as the unconditional probability is the probability "from the perspective of today," if the...
Just to add to the helpful comments already here: Question 76 is asking for the unconditional PD in year 4, which can be also answered by subtracting th 3-year cumulative PD from the 4-year cumulative PD: (1-5.5%)^4 - (1-5.5%)^3 = 4.64%. I like this calculation because to me it is somewhat intuitive: as the unconditional probability is the probability "from the perspective of today," if the...
Just to add to the helpful comments already here: Question 76 is asking for the unconditional PD in year 4, which can be also answered by subtracting th 3-year cumulative PD from the 4-year cumulative PD: (1-5.5%)^4 - (1-5.5%)^3 = 4.64%. I like this calculation because to me it is somewhat...
Just to add to the helpful comments already here: Question 76 is asking for the unconditional PD in year 4, which can be also answered by subtracting th 3-year cumulative PD from the 4-year...
Replies:
6
Views:
154
7. ### Collateral can increase exposure?

I think Gregory is just illustrating an outlier possibility related to "the need to post collateral and parameters such as minimum transfer amounts create some risk above the threshold." The portfolio value -15 implies this party has posted collateral but the collateral amount is not continously accurate (per MTA and other parameters) such that $18 has actually been posted and$3 is due to be...
I think Gregory is just illustrating an outlier possibility related to "the need to post collateral and parameters such as minimum transfer amounts create some risk above the threshold." The portfolio value -15 implies this party has posted collateral but the collateral amount is not continously accurate (per MTA and other parameters) such that $18 has actually been posted and$3 is due to be...
I think Gregory is just illustrating an outlier possibility related to "the need to post collateral and parameters such as minimum transfer amounts create some risk above the threshold." The portfolio value -15 implies this party has posted collateral but the collateral amount is not...
I think Gregory is just illustrating an outlier possibility related to "the need to post collateral and parameters such as minimum transfer amounts create some risk above the threshold." The...
Replies:
1
Views:
67
8. ### CDS and CDS Index long or short

@David Harper CFA FRM , no probs! With the amount of hard work and support you are giving to this forum at this moment, little mistakes are not unexpected!
@David Harper CFA FRM , no probs! With the amount of hard work and support you are giving to this forum at this moment, little mistakes are not unexpected!
@David Harper CFA FRM , no probs! With the amount of hard work and support you are giving to this forum at this moment, little mistakes are not unexpected!
@David Harper CFA FRM , no probs! With the amount of hard work and support you are giving to this forum at this moment, little mistakes are not unexpected!
Replies:
14
Views:
9,303
9. ### Merton formula

Hi @Arnaudc Okay, right, as I actually look at Malz currently, you are correct about his assumption in the first step (page 219). Sorry to misrepresent him on that, thank you for pushing back, I learned something here! (fwiw, my key influence is ) Malz page 219: "Example 6.3 (Merton Model): We apply the model to a firm that has an asset value of $140. We’ll assume the firm’s sole debt issue... Hi @Arnaudc Okay, right, as I actually look at Malz currently, you are correct about his assumption in the first step (page 219). Sorry to misrepresent him on that, thank you for pushing back, I learned something here! (fwiw, my key influence is ) Malz page 219: "Example 6.3 (Merton Model): We apply the model to a firm that has an asset value of$140. We’ll assume the firm’s sole debt issue...
Hi @Arnaudc Okay, right, as I actually look at Malz currently, you are correct about his assumption in the first step (page 219). Sorry to misrepresent him on that, thank you for pushing back, I learned something here! (fwiw, my key influence is ) Malz page 219: "Example 6.3 (Merton Model): We...
Hi @Arnaudc Okay, right, as I actually look at Malz currently, you are correct about his assumption in the first step (page 219). Sorry to misrepresent him on that, thank you for pushing back, I...
Replies:
10
Views:
1,389
10. ### GARP.FRM.PQ.P22016 GARP PQ - Question 5 - CDS (garp16-p2-5)

@David Harper CFA FRM , Thank you for confirming / clarifying! Regarding the LGD confusion, I think an easy way not to get it wrong is to understand the LGD as the loss an investor would suffer an a specific instrument without taking into account CDS protection. (then this LGD is simply plugged into CDS valuation formula's. Thanks again. Kind regards,
@David Harper CFA FRM , Thank you for confirming / clarifying! Regarding the LGD confusion, I think an easy way not to get it wrong is to understand the LGD as the loss an investor would suffer an a specific instrument without taking into account CDS protection. (then this LGD is simply plugged into CDS valuation formula's. Thanks again. Kind regards,
@David Harper CFA FRM , Thank you for confirming / clarifying! Regarding the LGD confusion, I think an easy way not to get it wrong is to understand the LGD as the loss an investor would suffer an a specific instrument without taking into account CDS protection. (then this LGD is simply plugged...
@David Harper CFA FRM , Thank you for confirming / clarifying! Regarding the LGD confusion, I think an easy way not to get it wrong is to understand the LGD as the loss an investor would suffer an...
Replies:
6
Views:
294
11. ### P2.T6.309. Default correlation, Malz sections 8.1 and 8.2

I am sorry. I goofed up. I had this question no. 74 in mind when I raised the query.
I am sorry. I goofed up. I had this question no. 74 in mind when I raised the query.
I am sorry. I goofed up. I had this question no. 74 in mind when I raised the query.
I am sorry. I goofed up. I had this question no. 74 in mind when I raised the query.
Replies:
2
Views:
81
12. ### GARP.FRM.PQ.P2hazard rate (garp16-p2-33)

Hi @frmqiu Yes, the language in question 2016.P2.Q33 was reported earlier in the year as imprecise. I recall that GARP agreed with our feedback. @Deepak Chitnis is correct that the solution implicitly is the discrete conditional PD, but the phrasing suggests it wants a joint probability. Please see here for more detail
Hi @frmqiu Yes, the language in question 2016.P2.Q33 was reported earlier in the year as imprecise. I recall that GARP agreed with our feedback. @Deepak Chitnis is correct that the solution implicitly is the discrete conditional PD, but the phrasing suggests it wants a joint probability. Please see here for more detail
Hi @frmqiu Yes, the language in question 2016.P2.Q33 was reported earlier in the year as imprecise. I recall that GARP agreed with our feedback. @Deepak Chitnis is correct that the solution implicitly is the discrete conditional PD, but the phrasing suggests it wants a joint probability....
Hi @frmqiu Yes, the language in question 2016.P2.Q33 was reported earlier in the year as imprecise. I recall that GARP agreed with our feedback. @Deepak Chitnis is correct that the solution...
Replies:
3
Views:
86
13. ### Merton drift in DD

Hi All, P2.T6.R43 I am trying to conceptually understand how the DD value is calculated statistically. The numerator is the expected value of the price, and the denominator is the standard deviation. My question relates to the numerator. Assume T-t=1 ln(Vo/K) is the current log "return" at T=0. We then add what I assume is the expected drift until maturity (r-(sig^2)/2). How am I supposed...
Hi All, P2.T6.R43 I am trying to conceptually understand how the DD value is calculated statistically. The numerator is the expected value of the price, and the denominator is the standard deviation. My question relates to the numerator. Assume T-t=1 ln(Vo/K) is the current log "return" at T=0. We then add what I assume is the expected drift until maturity (r-(sig^2)/2). How am I supposed...
Hi All, P2.T6.R43 I am trying to conceptually understand how the DD value is calculated statistically. The numerator is the expected value of the price, and the denominator is the standard deviation. My question relates to the numerator. Assume T-t=1 ln(Vo/K) is the current log "return" at...
Hi All, P2.T6.R43 I am trying to conceptually understand how the DD value is calculated statistically. The numerator is the expected value of the price, and the denominator is the standard...
Replies:
0
Views:
96
14. ### Total Return Swap (Crouhy) - Figure 12-7 - mistake?

many thanks, David! Apologies,I was referring to Crouhy's first edition in my question (there it is Figure 12-7). Now it makes good sense.
many thanks, David! Apologies,I was referring to Crouhy's first edition in my question (there it is Figure 12-7). Now it makes good sense.
many thanks, David! Apologies,I was referring to Crouhy's first edition in my question (there it is Figure 12-7). Now it makes good sense.
many thanks, David! Apologies,I was referring to Crouhy's first edition in my question (there it is Figure 12-7). Now it makes good sense.
Replies:
3
Views:
123
15. ### MtM and Exposure for Netting

Hi @arkabose Yes, agreed. Your circled item is from the source (Gregory) and it's not listed in his errata that I can see (). However, I agree with you. This looks like a mistake to me (sorry). Your second paragraph, of course, is CORRECT: in a fixed cross-currency swap, the counterparty who pays the higher interest rate has a positive expected future M2M; i.e., the higher relative rate, per...
Hi @arkabose Yes, agreed. Your circled item is from the source (Gregory) and it's not listed in his errata that I can see (). However, I agree with you. This looks like a mistake to me (sorry). Your second paragraph, of course, is CORRECT: in a fixed cross-currency swap, the counterparty who pays the higher interest rate has a positive expected future M2M; i.e., the higher relative rate, per...
Hi @arkabose Yes, agreed. Your circled item is from the source (Gregory) and it's not listed in his errata that I can see (). However, I agree with you. This looks like a mistake to me (sorry). Your second paragraph, of course, is CORRECT: in a fixed cross-currency swap, the counterparty who...
Hi @arkabose Yes, agreed. Your circled item is from the source (Gregory) and it's not listed in his errata that I can see (). However, I agree with you. This looks like a mistake to me (sorry)....
Replies:
1
Views:
164
16. ### Netting factor

Thanks vm for the confirmation David. Makes sense with this lower bound. Rgds,
Thanks vm for the confirmation David. Makes sense with this lower bound. Rgds,
Thanks vm for the confirmation David. Makes sense with this lower bound. Rgds,
Thanks vm for the confirmation David. Makes sense with this lower bound. Rgds,
Replies:
2
Views:
176
17. ### GARP.FRM.PQ.P22016 GARP PQ - Question 52 -Netting

Hi @no_ming In this question, the type of instruments don't really matter as the question is giving you the mark-to-market value ("current market value" of the positions. Credit exposure is max(value, 0). So the credit exposure here without netting is 54, but with netting it is only 21: Without netting: max(0, +21) + max(0, -33) + max(0, +33) = 54 With netting: max(0, 21 - 33 + 33) = 21
Hi @no_ming In this question, the type of instruments don't really matter as the question is giving you the mark-to-market value ("current market value" of the positions. Credit exposure is max(value, 0). So the credit exposure here without netting is 54, but with netting it is only 21: Without netting: max(0, +21) + max(0, -33) + max(0, +33) = 54 With netting: max(0, 21 - 33 + 33) = 21
Hi @no_ming In this question, the type of instruments don't really matter as the question is giving you the mark-to-market value ("current market value" of the positions. Credit exposure is max(value, 0). So the credit exposure here without netting is 54, but with netting it is only...
Hi @no_ming In this question, the type of instruments don't really matter as the question is giving you the mark-to-market value ("current market value" of the positions. Credit exposure is...
Replies:
1
Views:
162
18. ### de Servigny, Chapter 3 - Spreadsheet

Hello @mh2452 Any spreadsheets that are not published under the individual readings are published under that topic's Topic Review section in spreadsheet bundles. So if you to into Topic 6, you will find the spreadsheet bundles for that topic. I hope this helps! Nicole
Hello @mh2452 Any spreadsheets that are not published under the individual readings are published under that topic's Topic Review section in spreadsheet bundles. So if you to into Topic 6, you will find the spreadsheet bundles for that topic. I hope this helps! Nicole
Hello @mh2452 Any spreadsheets that are not published under the individual readings are published under that topic's Topic Review section in spreadsheet bundles. So if you to into Topic 6, you will find the spreadsheet bundles for that topic. I hope this helps! Nicole
Hello @mh2452 Any spreadsheets that are not published under the individual readings are published under that topic's Topic Review section in spreadsheet bundles. So if you to into Topic 6, you...
Replies:
1
Views:
95

Hi @no_ming Your question is good because sometimes default is assumed to refer to only the principal (as your solution infers), however here (in my opinion) the question does specify "accumulates 6.625 mm of losses from defaults and unpaid interest." And, this is natural (yes?): losses should refer to both unpaid principal and unpaid interest. So, given the phrasing, appropriate would be...
Hi @no_ming Your question is good because sometimes default is assumed to refer to only the principal (as your solution infers), however here (in my opinion) the question does specify "accumulates 6.625 mm of losses from defaults and unpaid interest." And, this is natural (yes?): losses should refer to both unpaid principal and unpaid interest. So, given the phrasing, appropriate would be...
Hi @no_ming Your question is good because sometimes default is assumed to refer to only the principal (as your solution infers), however here (in my opinion) the question does specify "accumulates 6.625 mm of losses from defaults and unpaid interest." And, this is natural (yes?): losses should...
Hi @no_ming Your question is good because sometimes default is assumed to refer to only the principal (as your solution infers), however here (in my opinion) the question does specify "accumulates...
Replies:
3
Views:
158
20. ### PFE & EE Question~

@no_ming Re: In another word, not only EE, if Sigma and mean increase, PFE, EPE etc. also increase, is that right? Yes, if you increase µ or σ then you are shifting or "expanding" (dispersing) the normal distribution, so the x% PFE will increase, in the same way that higher volatility or lower return will increase (absolute) value at risk because there x% tail (quantile) is further into loss...
@no_ming Re: In another word, not only EE, if Sigma and mean increase, PFE, EPE etc. also increase, is that right? Yes, if you increase µ or σ then you are shifting or "expanding" (dispersing) the normal distribution, so the x% PFE will increase, in the same way that higher volatility or lower return will increase (absolute) value at risk because there x% tail (quantile) is further into loss...
@no_ming Re: In another word, not only EE, if Sigma and mean increase, PFE, EPE etc. also increase, is that right? Yes, if you increase µ or σ then you are shifting or "expanding" (dispersing) the normal distribution, so the x% PFE will increase, in the same way that higher volatility or lower...
@no_ming Re: In another word, not only EE, if Sigma and mean increase, PFE, EPE etc. also increase, is that right? Yes, if you increase µ or σ then you are shifting or "expanding" (dispersing) the...
Replies:
8
Views:
187
21. ### PQ-externalCVA & credit limit question:

Mr. Harper, very clear explanation , thanks a lot. Dr. Jayanthi Sankaran, also thanks for your help.
Mr. Harper, very clear explanation , thanks a lot. Dr. Jayanthi Sankaran, also thanks for your help.
Mr. Harper, very clear explanation , thanks a lot. Dr. Jayanthi Sankaran, also thanks for your help.
Mr. Harper, very clear explanation , thanks a lot. Dr. Jayanthi Sankaran, also thanks for your help.
Replies:
3
Views:
160
22. ### Equity tranche spread wrt correlation

Hello Sir, Can you please help me with the below question Question 1 Part a) Consider the following assets present in loan portfolio of IMT Bank Ltd, all the assets below are mortgage loans. Exposure 1 Exposure 2 Exposure 3 Portfolio Commitment $100,000,000$120,000,000 ...
Hello Sir, Can you please help me with the below question Question 1 Part a) Consider the following assets present in loan portfolio of IMT Bank Ltd, all the assets below are mortgage loans. Exposure 1 Exposure 2 Exposure 3 Portfolio Commitment $100,000,000$120,000,000 ...
Hello Sir, Can you please help me with the below question Question 1 Part a) Consider the following assets present in loan portfolio of IMT Bank Ltd, all the assets below are mortgage loans. Exposure 1 Exposure 2 Exposure 3 ...
Hello Sir, Can you please help me with the below question Question 1 Part a) Consider the following assets present in loan portfolio of IMT Bank Ltd, all the assets below are mortgage loans. ...
Replies:
8
Views:
1,801
23. ### GARP.FRM.PQ.P2question in derivation process of merton model credit spread

Logarithm quotient rule logb(x / y) = logb(x) - logb(y) is the formula used for calculation its not 1/x it x/y ...
Logarithm quotient rule logb(x / y) = logb(x) - logb(y) is the formula used for calculation its not 1/x it x/y ...
Logarithm quotient rule logb(x / y) = logb(x) - logb(y) is the formula used for calculation its not 1/x it x/y ...
Logarithm quotient rule logb(x / y) = logb(x) - logb(y) is the formula used for calculation its not 1/x it x/y ...
Replies:
1
Views:
123

Hi to all! If I understood correctly, banks apply a commitment fee (fixed percentage) on the undrawn portion of a credit line to hedge the further expected loss associated with that credit exposition. So you have to pay more if you are using a small drawn portion of the credit line. Now, given the fact that a firm with an high rating (such as AA or A) will only use a small part of the credit...
Hi to all! If I understood correctly, banks apply a commitment fee (fixed percentage) on the undrawn portion of a credit line to hedge the further expected loss associated with that credit exposition. So you have to pay more if you are using a small drawn portion of the credit line. Now, given the fact that a firm with an high rating (such as AA or A) will only use a small part of the credit...
Hi to all! If I understood correctly, banks apply a commitment fee (fixed percentage) on the undrawn portion of a credit line to hedge the further expected loss associated with that credit exposition. So you have to pay more if you are using a small drawn portion of the credit line. Now, given...
Hi to all! If I understood correctly, banks apply a commitment fee (fixed percentage) on the undrawn portion of a credit line to hedge the further expected loss associated with that credit...
Replies:
0
Views:
90
25. ### Credit Exposure

Hi @Stuti It's the same square root rule that let's us scale volatility/VaR per sqrt(ΔT) but therefore importantly it is conditional on the same i.i.d. assumption, namely that the returns of the credit risk factor are independent. Further, this is the simplest possible credit exposure profile; i.e., a single i.i.d. credit risk factor. For example, in a swap, sqrt(ΔT) tends to characterize...
Hi @Stuti It's the same square root rule that let's us scale volatility/VaR per sqrt(ΔT) but therefore importantly it is conditional on the same i.i.d. assumption, namely that the returns of the credit risk factor are independent. Further, this is the simplest possible credit exposure profile; i.e., a single i.i.d. credit risk factor. For example, in a swap, sqrt(ΔT) tends to characterize...
Hi @Stuti It's the same square root rule that let's us scale volatility/VaR per sqrt(ΔT) but therefore importantly it is conditional on the same i.i.d. assumption, namely that the returns of the credit risk factor are independent. Further, this is the simplest possible credit exposure...
Hi @Stuti It's the same square root rule that let's us scale volatility/VaR per sqrt(ΔT) but therefore importantly it is conditional on the same i.i.d. assumption, namely that the returns of the...
Replies:
1
Views:
72
26. ### CDS pricing question!

Hi @no_ming Yes, on one level, that's correct: the question implies an increase in price and, if we naively assume that the price determines the collateral posted (as the question implies), then the price increase implies additional collateral is posted. As discussed, most of the price movement should be fundamental (i.e., changes in the reference's credit quality) but, as is always the case,...
Hi @no_ming Yes, on one level, that's correct: the question implies an increase in price and, if we naively assume that the price determines the collateral posted (as the question implies), then the price increase implies additional collateral is posted. As discussed, most of the price movement should be fundamental (i.e., changes in the reference's credit quality) but, as is always the case,...
Hi @no_ming Yes, on one level, that's correct: the question implies an increase in price and, if we naively assume that the price determines the collateral posted (as the question implies), then the price increase implies additional collateral is posted. As discussed, most of the price movement...
Hi @no_ming Yes, on one level, that's correct: the question implies an increase in price and, if we naively assume that the price determines the collateral posted (as the question implies), then...
Replies:
8
Views:
312
27. ### Real world application: Deriving default probabilities from observed CDS spreads

Hi there, I have to solve a problem which is actually a real world application of Malz, Chapter 7 - Bootstrapping default probabilities given an observable CDS spread curve. Please refer to the excel attached: I have created an excel spreadsheet that should do the calculation. What it basically does is - given an observable CDS spread curve - modelling the cash flows of a hypothetical CDS...
Hi there, I have to solve a problem which is actually a real world application of Malz, Chapter 7 - Bootstrapping default probabilities given an observable CDS spread curve. Please refer to the excel attached: I have created an excel spreadsheet that should do the calculation. What it basically does is - given an observable CDS spread curve - modelling the cash flows of a hypothetical CDS...
Hi there, I have to solve a problem which is actually a real world application of Malz, Chapter 7 - Bootstrapping default probabilities given an observable CDS spread curve. Please refer to the excel attached: I have created an excel spreadsheet that should do the calculation. What it...
Hi there, I have to solve a problem which is actually a real world application of Malz, Chapter 7 - Bootstrapping default probabilities given an observable CDS spread curve. Please refer to the...
Replies:
0
Views:
303
28. ### Credit curve and CVA

Hi @taunk , Yes, typo on my end. You're right. Explanation became a little too wordy so I missed my own typo . Thanks for correcting!
Hi @taunk , Yes, typo on my end. You're right. Explanation became a little too wordy so I missed my own typo . Thanks for correcting!
Hi @taunk , Yes, typo on my end. You're right. Explanation became a little too wordy so I missed my own typo . Thanks for correcting!
Hi @taunk , Yes, typo on my end. You're right. Explanation became a little too wordy so I missed my own typo . Thanks for correcting!
Replies:
7
Views:
370
29. ### Marginal CVA

Hi @ami44 In regard to to Gregory's Table 12.6 above, I would just add: On the total line, there is only a summation of standalone CVAs (392,973) which is maybe not so useful except as as unrealistic, undiversified CVA (but diversification here, just exactly as @ami44 says, is a dynamic really due to the netting agreement in the netting set) versus the "actual" (i.e., diversified at the...
Hi @ami44 In regard to to Gregory's Table 12.6 above, I would just add: On the total line, there is only a summation of standalone CVAs (392,973) which is maybe not so useful except as as unrealistic, undiversified CVA (but diversification here, just exactly as @ami44 says, is a dynamic really due to the netting agreement in the netting set) versus the "actual" (i.e., diversified at the...
Hi @ami44 In regard to to Gregory's Table 12.6 above, I would just add: On the total line, there is only a summation of standalone CVAs (392,973) which is maybe not so useful except as as unrealistic, undiversified CVA (but diversification here, just exactly as @ami44 says, is a dynamic really...
Hi @ami44 In regard to to Gregory's Table 12.6 above, I would just add: On the total line, there is only a summation of standalone CVAs (392,973) which is maybe not so useful except as as...
Replies:
9
Views:
454
30. ### Delivery squeeze

Hi @ami44, Just adding a little more to the CDS-bond basis = CDS spread - Asset swap spread An asset swap exchanges the coupon of a corporate bond for LIBOR plus a spread. Reproducing an example from Hull: Let's take a situation where the asset swap spread on a particular bond = 150 bps. There are three likely scenarios: 1) Bond Price = Par value of $100. The swap involves Company A paying... Hi @ami44, Just adding a little more to the CDS-bond basis = CDS spread - Asset swap spread An asset swap exchanges the coupon of a corporate bond for LIBOR plus a spread. Reproducing an example from Hull: Let's take a situation where the asset swap spread on a particular bond = 150 bps. There are three likely scenarios: 1) Bond Price = Par value of$100. The swap involves Company A paying...
Hi @ami44, Just adding a little more to the CDS-bond basis = CDS spread - Asset swap spread An asset swap exchanges the coupon of a corporate bond for LIBOR plus a spread. Reproducing an example from Hull: Let's take a situation where the asset swap spread on a particular bond = 150 bps....
Hi @ami44, Just adding a little more to the CDS-bond basis = CDS spread - Asset swap spread An asset swap exchanges the coupon of a corporate bond for LIBOR plus a spread. Reproducing an example...
Replies:
16
Views:
296
31. ### CVA

Thank you, so it is kind of sensitivity analysis rather than the actual mechanism which i was confused about.
Thank you, so it is kind of sensitivity analysis rather than the actual mechanism which i was confused about.
Thank you, so it is kind of sensitivity analysis rather than the actual mechanism which i was confused about.
Thank you, so it is kind of sensitivity analysis rather than the actual mechanism which i was confused about.
Replies:
9
Views:
378