What's new

Recent content by flex

  1. F

    Delta hedging two options

    yes, 'pure' strangle implied minimum sizes mismatch (even as to minimize d/hedge). But there's more important, unlike you case, that options was OTM. for 0,6198 & -0,5591 deltas (10cll + 20pt), to delta-neutral need +498 underlyying
  2. F

    Delta hedging two options

    hi, @rejdi94 some explanation need for ('you strangle' exposure leg's sizes): 1. are '10 & 20 items' the numbers of opion contracts by 100 underlying shares each?
  3. F

    Exam Feedback May 2019 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    Can U remember 'sgm' value?
  4. F

    R19.P1.T3.FIN_PRODS_HULL_Ch6_Topic: EuroDollarFuturesContracts

    hi, @David Harper CFA FRM .sorry, much... can u clarify one feature (across 'Convention' tasks) for me: i noticed, that indifferent from task ('direct' for that %rate is derived from quoted price or 'reverse' when quoted price calc is target from %) day-count rescaling performed at last step...
  5. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    i'm agree to use 1 - P(k=0) - P(k=1) as appropriate))
  6. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    exactly
  7. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    i already replied same (like) qstn prev feedback, in this topic lamda != (isn't equal) 5, however u solving approache is true. and also i've felt regret b/c somebodies posters both can't carefull read old feedbacks and post and recall exam qstn content withOUT minimal required acuuracy.
  8. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    can somebody recall (or simply type U selected answ) accurately qstn concerned regression beta confidence interval construct (where're beta0 =arround +0.58, large sample and 2 option contain hi-bound 1.3+) can't remember all options for qstn, extra condition for beta and confidence lvl.
  9. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    what's under MSC implied? i have to details something: in the case of MCS or 'samplErr reducing' precense at a context, bootstrap isn't appropriate mention, b/c bootstrap is independent simulation method (differ from MC conceptually)
  10. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    is u implied qstn containing CHF net bought& NFA & CHF exchange rate change as inputs? genneraly, cs(0;t) can derive from LGD&PD, can uremember other alternatives?
  11. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    i think that depend on qstn context: for 'what kind MITIGATE' - must be c/party, but for 'TRANSFER to' U answer is right. yep, 'advancer' want to be a float receiver
  12. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    it's an incredible work, the great respect. can u remember: there was kurtosis mentioned at this (#32) qstn?
  13. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    that's true
  14. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    may be there was a (k/T) axis, b/c invertible chart occurs at that case
  15. F

    November 2018 Part 1 Exam Feedback

    i think, that replacement = aka `control variates`
Top