If 30% of the questions are wrong it’s a good exam? If it has zero transparency and test is not electronic it’s a good exam? GARP doesn’t know how to test risk management. Most of the things are testing would be better on a computer in an applied setting.
I would also like to point out that I know Nassim Taleb personally and he thinks people involved in the academic risk industry are incompetent. This means people like Jorion and the people behind the FRM.
= (39.03)(0.58) − (40)−(0.09)(0.5) (0.4359) = $ 3.671 . this is the answer from Hull with dividends. did they want use to computer the present value of the dividends? or was it a trick question. either way. the exam is way way way too difficult