Butterfly Spreads vs. Straddle Writes

kwadwo69

New Member
Hi David. Just wondering: why would an investor choose a butterfly spread over a straddle write if the expectation is that the stock price movement would be minimal? Purely risk considerations? And why would the reverse happen, i.e. an investor chooses a straddle write over a butterfly spread?
 

David Harper CFA FRM

David Harper CFA FRM
Subscriber
Hi kwadwo,

Since that would be a great practice question, and i had no idea without researching it (really, I sometimes get a question that baffles me, which is fun!), I entered into the XLS for comparison. FYI, http://db.tt/aQeIwAWU

Summary comparison of long butterfly spread vs short (write) straddle:

* In common: both are short volatility trades and max payout if stock remains range-bound
* Difference in initial setup: long butterfly has a small COST; short straddle generates significant INCOME (2 option premiums)
* Upside is capped for both but higher for straddle. For butterfly, upside capped at [difference between strikes and net cost; in my XLS, $2 - 0.37 = $1.63);
* Downside for long butterfly is CAPPED (at initial cost!), but unlimited for short straddle

So, this is interesting to me, at first glance i'd summarize the difference as: although both are short volatility (aka, sideways strategies) with CAPPED upside, the straddle is higher-risk/higher reward due to (i) it collects initial income and has higher upside, but IMPORTANTLY (ii) you pay for this with unlimited downside, compared to the long butterfly which has a downside limited to the initial cost.

... on a personal note, i can't imagine writing a straddle, it just looks SCARY to me with downside in both directions (yikes!). Between these two, the butterfly looks a lot more appealing to me

Thanks, David
 

kwadwo69

New Member
Thought so too (writing a straddle IS indeed scary). Good insight and reinforcement of the point! Thanks.
 
Top