Week in Financial Education (May 10, 2021)
Welcome to the latest week in financial education (WIFE)! As the May exams have started, we experienced another busy week. We are grateful for some fabulous contributions by members (see links below). At this time of year, many candidates are naturally focused on practice question revision, not just from our database but also from other sources like GARP®’s Practice Exams. This always elicits informative feedback on the issue of question quality. We are constantly reminded that Imprecise or poorly worded questions prove to be debatable (or at least confusing) when they are stress tested. In the worst case, a flawed question can actually reinforce a mental mistake. GARP’s question about a repo transaction (link below) is a fine example. This is a question that GARP had already revised twice in 2016-17 due to imprecisions but even their updated version could be improved. My strong belief is that a good question should not make the candidate struggle to interpret any input assumption (e.g., is the given bond price a quote price or an invoice price?); given limited time, it is hard enough to perform the calculation required by the question.
I hope you like this week’s new practice questions. The new correlations (Chapter 12) set should give you good coverage on some useful techniques: The Jarque-Bera test of normality, the power law for heavy-tail distributions, and a low-difficulty quiz asking you to find rank (Spearman’s and Kendall’s tau) correlations. The latter (rank correlations) is also a concept in Topic 5 (Part 2, Market Risk) where we had the pleasure of contributing an edit to FRM® author Gunter Meissner’s book (see https://trtl.bz/2rseaBT for details). If you happen to be a visual thinker like me, here is how I handle concordant/discordant pairs, it’s simple: concordant pairs lie in the first (I) or third (III) quadrant https://trtl.bz/3y76ans. About the portfolio construction question set, I calibrated them as approachable; as we’ve often observed, the weakness of this reading assignment (Grinold Chapter 14) is the lack of scaffolding: the material presumes you’ve read prior chapters in the book. Have a good study week!
1. [P1.T2] Generalized student’s t versus student’s t https://trtl.bz/3f0VE8m
2. [P1.T3] Thank you to librosdeholanda for noticing our question should refer to a trading strategy profit rather than payoff https://trtl.bz/3nYzXde
3. [P1.T3] Thank you lushukai for helpful swap pricing observations https://trtl.bz/33r0YfQ
4. [P1.T3] Thank you shuffleshoe for correcting an imprecision in our strap ROI question https://trtl.bz/3vUpMt2
5. [P1.T4] Jagan.Ganti with a great observation that forward spreads aren’t exactly equal to spot spreads https://trtl.bz/3eCgyff
6. [P1.T4] Which makes more efficient use of data, parametric VaR or historical simulation (HS) VaR? https://trtl.bz/3uA9dSH
8. [P2.T8] The unfair cognitive load of an imprecise repo question https://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/threads/garp-2021-pre-study-pack-q2-repo.23813/ and its antecedent from the 2020 Part 2 Practice Exam https://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/threads/garp-2020-practice-exam-part-2-q74.23268/
9. [P2.T9] sohinichowdhury offers a more elegant M^2 formula https://trtl.bz/3hekmF1
10. [P2.T9] What is a realistically high/low R^2 in empirical finance? https://trtl.bz/33wYH2R
11. [P2.T9] Thank you @badbunny for calculator assistance https://trtl.bz/3ybTgEG
Curated Links (items you might like)
2. Risk Appetite and Risk Tolerance (Which definitions do you use?) by Carol Williams https://www.erminsightsbycarol.com/risk-appetite-tolerance-definitions/
Week in Financial Education (May 17, 2021)
Welcome to another Week in Financial Education! This week saw some great questions and fascinating insights. I will just highlight the instructive example of a...
Week in Financial Education (May 10, 2021)
Welcome to the latest week in financial education (WIFE)! As the May exams have started, we experienced another busy week. We are grateful for some...
What Your Colleagues Are Saying
I took the exam in Sydney and had a similar feeling about the exam being more qualitative (but no less rigorous). However, I felt I was better prepared thanks to the BT's relentless focus on throwing real life examples and methods.
I subscribed to BT for my Part 1 FRM exam and just wanted to say thanks for the depth and breadth of the study materials and practice questions. I found out that I scored in the top quartile of every topic and I absolutely could not have done this without using BT - I spent many, many hours going over the practice questions and answers! I wanted to express my appreciation and gratitude to your team for your hard work in creating these materials. Thanks!
The BT scripts, practice questions, global topic drills and mock exams were a great help in understanding the concepts (which I could already apply on the job!) and where structured in such a manner that the breadth and depth where optimal for exam preparation - clearly the exam would have been a catastrophe without BT!
Passed first time. Happy all the hard work paid off. BT was the right choice. Thanks David and Nicole for your work and commitment.
Passed! 1,4,1,2,1,4! Thank you David and Nicole for your efforts! Thank you BT! Couldn't have done it otherwise. I'm a mechanical engineer who had a career in petroleum services, then I decided to switch career to financial risk management. Passed part 1 from the first time with top quartiles and passed part 2 from the first time as well. All with BT! BT is always the recommendation I give to people aiming at the FRM designation! Thank you again!
Passed Part I and Part II first time - absolutely could not have done it without BT. Like a few others I didn't even both buying the GARP books for Part II and went solely with BT materials. Just read, answered questions, watched videos, read, more questions, and... more questions! All the practice question taking looked to pay off. Thanks again Bionic Turtle for a great curriculum. Keep up the fantastic work!