Subcribe to the Bionic Turtle Blog

## Week in Financial Education (May 24, 2021)

In our latest Week in Financial Education (WIFE), Richie’s new video helpfully reviews a series of duration questions, including modified, Macaulay, money duration, and price value of basis point (PVBP; aka, PV01). Compared to the FRM®, the CFA’s approach to duration differs only slightly. The formulas are essentially similar. The CFA’s modified duration is analytical (e.g., solved functionally) while its approximate modified duration is called effective duration in the FRM (i.e., approximated or simulated by shocking an interest rate factor). The CFA’s approximate modified duration shocks the yield (reprices the bond) while its effective duration instead re-prices a term structure (aka, benchmark curve). However–as far as I can tell–both are parallel shifts (geeky note: a parallel shift implies single-factor but single-factor models can be non-parallel). For myself, I do not view the CFA’s distinction between approximate modified duration and effective duration (which are both effective duration in the FRM; the FRM starts from a fairly generalized interest rate factor/vector) as highly consequential. They are both durations approximated via a parallel shift. New learners should be able to see that most of these vocabularies refer to different approaches around the same single concept, but measured in different ways (as a percentage, a time/maturity, or a dollar implication). You’ve got to do the practice just like Richie shows us. Finally, the FRM’s dollar duration is called money duration in the CFA. It gets less attention (mathematically this is the tangent line’s negated slope, less prone to interpretation, but it’s just a rescaled PVBP * 10,000 because there are 10,000 basis points in 100.0%) but money duration/PVBP are arguably the most useful because we use them to hedge.

I hope you like the new practice question sets. I am happy with the code snippet that illustrates an antithetic variate: you don’t need code background to follow this super simple example. Question 21.6.2. also employs a code snippet, but notice how you don’t really need it to answer the question! I am trying to give us practice that is useful. Simulation is not a passive reading exercise, it is done in code. You can spend an entire day reading about bootstrapping and you may never learn it. Bootstrapping is truly a doing thing. I actually put much effort into writing brief snippets (with comments) in the hopes they serve you with realistic examples. Have a good study week!

1. CFA: Tackling classic duration questions https://trtl.bz/3vdIagw

## New Practice Questions

1. P1.T2.21.6 Bootstrapping and antithetic/control variates https://trtl.bz/3fcvDEo

2. P2.T9.21.6. Marginal value at risk (VaR) in portfolio management https://trtl.bz/3ubMtaz

## Forum News

1. May Part 1 FRM exam feedback: https://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/threads/may-2021-part-1-exam-feedback.23842/

2. May Part 2 FRM exam feedback (continued) https://www.bionicturtle.com/forum/threads/may-2021-part-2-exam-feedback.23825/

3. [P1.T1] Does value at risk (VaR) favor short horizons? https://trtl.bz/34alHoC

4. [P1.T1] Capital market line (CML) https://trtl.bz/3ubTV5O

5. [P1.T2] Power is conditional on false null, p-value is conditional on a true null (is why power is harder to estimate) https://trtl.bz/2ShztTG

6. [P1.T2] The Box-Pierce joint test of autocorrelations assumes the sample correlations (aka, ACF) is asymptotically normal https://trtl.bz/3ve1muB

7. [P1.T2] Brute force illustration of quarterly trend model https://trtl.bz/3vrrDFX

8. [P1.T3. GARP® PQ] What are the impacts of liquidity and transaction costs on forward/futures contracts? https://trtl.bz/3u84BCo

9. [P1.T3] Insurance company balance sheet https://trtl.bz/3oFTxvd

10. [P1.T4] Bond-equivalent basis (i.e., per annum with semi-annual compounding) is a mere but relevant convention https://trtl.bz/3fa7Q8a

11. [P1.T4] Absolute versus relative value at risk (VaR) https://trtl.bz/3uih0Ui

12. [P2.T6] Is it better to use spread or hazard rate for CVA approximation? https://trtl.bz/3udPVBJ

13. [P2.T6] Comparing Gregory’s marginal/incremental CVA to Crouhy’s marginal/incremental capital https://trtl.bz/3veeIHh

14. [P2.T6] Gregory’s model for overall exposure given threshold and MTA assumptions https://trtl.bz/347xKTC

## Recent Posts

### Week in Financial Education (May 17, 2021)

Welcome to another Week in Financial Education! This week saw some great questions and fascinating insights. I will just highlight the instructive example of a...

### Week in Financial Education (May 10, 2021)

Welcome to the latest week in financial education (WIFE)! As the May exams have started, we experienced another busy week. We are grateful for some...

### Week in Financial Education (May 3, 2021)

Hello, welcome to another WIFE! Our FRM forum was super busy last week. I wrote a long reply to the question (link below) about the...

### What Your Colleagues Are Saying

I took the exam in Sydney and had a similar feeling about the exam being more qualitative (but no less rigorous). However, I felt I was better prepared thanks to the BT's relentless focus on throwing real life examples and methods.

Jagan G.

I subscribed to BT for my Part 1 FRM exam and just wanted to say thanks for the depth and breadth of the study materials and practice questions. I found out that I scored in the top quartile of every topic and I absolutely could not have done this without using BT - I spent many, many hours going over the practice questions and answers! I wanted to express my appreciation and gratitude to your team for your hard work in creating these materials. Thanks!

Shu C.

The BT scripts, practice questions, global topic drills and mock exams were a great help in understanding the concepts (which I could already apply on the job!) and where structured in such a manner that the breadth and depth where optimal for exam preparation - clearly the exam would have been a catastrophe without BT!

Ivan J.

Passed first time. Happy all the hard work paid off. BT was the right choice. Thanks David and Nicole for your work and commitment.

John D.

Passed! 1,4,1,2,1,4! Thank you David and Nicole for your efforts! Thank you BT! Couldn't have done it otherwise. I'm a mechanical engineer who had a career in petroleum services, then I decided to switch career to financial risk management. Passed part 1 from the first time with top quartiles and passed part 2 from the first time as well. All with BT! BT is always the recommendation I give to people aiming at the FRM designation! Thank you again!

Feras S.

Passed Part I and Part II first time - absolutely could not have done it without BT. Like a few others I didn't even both buying the GARP books for Part II and went solely with BT materials. Just read, answered questions, watched videos, read, more questions, and... more questions! All the practice question taking looked to pay off. Thanks again Bionic Turtle for a great curriculum. Keep up the fantastic work!

John D.